The Beach at Sainte-Adresse[1]
1867
Oil on canvas; 75.8 × 102.5 cm (29 13/16 × 40 5/16 in.)
Signed and dated: Claude Monet 67 (lower right, name in dark-brown paint, year in reddish-purple paint)
The Art Institute of Chicago, Mr. and Mrs. Lewis Larned Coburn Memorial Collection, 1933.439
Monet and Normandy
In the mid-1860s, Claude Monet returned to the coast of Normandy—a place whose picturesque sites, villages, and vantage points he knew well, having spent much of his childhood in the coastal town of Le Havre (fig. 13.1). The area had changed dramatically over the course of the nineteenth century, however, due in large part to the expanding rail network and the proliferation of travel guidebooks and illustrated publications. The small, rural fishing villages of the beginning of the century were rapidly transformed into seaside resorts for tourists and vacationers, altering the physical and social landscape in dramatic ways.[2]
1
Fig. 13.1
Map featuring Paris and the region of Normandy.
Not only did the coastline and geological sites of Normandy become popular with tourists, they were also favorite subjects of many nineteenth-century artists, especially Monet, who painted the region’s natural and man-made attractions hundreds of times during his career and is considered by many to be the “greatest visual poet of Normandy.”[3] Monet’s seascapes of the 1860s—the decade before he emerged as the leader of the Impressionist movement—most often feature the coasts of Le Havre (on the northern bank of the estuary of the Seine), Honfleur (on the southern bank across from Le Havre), and, as in the present picture, Sainte-Adresse, a coastal suburb just northwest of Le Havre where the artist’s aunt owned a villa. Scholars have noted that public opinion at this time was divided on the condition of Sainte-Adresse: some writers commented that “all the seductions of solitude, silence and oceanic contemplation still reign there,”[4] while others complained that it had “lost most of the rustic appearance which gave it its charm.”[5] In any event, Sainte-Adresse had certainly arrived in the public imagination by the mid-1860s, popularized in the writings of the French critic Alphonse Karr[6] and documented by artists including painters Frédéric Bazille,[7] Jean-Baptiste-Camille Corot,[8] and Johan Barthold Jongkind,[9] as well as photographer Gustave Le Gray (fig. 13.2 and fig. 13.3).[10] It is through this complex lens that one must read Monet’s The Beach at Sainte-Adresse.2
Fig. 13.2
Gustave Le Gray (French, 1820–1884). The Beach at Sainte-Adresse, from the album Vistas del mar, 1856/57. Albumen print from wet collodion on glass negative; 31.3 × 38.5 cm (12 5/16 × 15 3/16 in.). The Art Institute of Chicago, Hugh Edwards Fund, 1971.577.15.
Fig. 13.3
Gustave Le Gray (French, 1820–1884). The Beach at Sainte-Adresse, with the Dumont Baths, from the album Vistas del mar, 1856/57. Albumen print from wet collodion on glass negative; 31.7 × 41 cm (12 1/2 × 16 1/8). The Art Institute of Chicago, Hugh Edwards Fund, 1971.577.8.
Monet’s Early Paintings of Sainte-Adresse and the Coast of Normandy
The Beach at Sainte-Adresse was executed in the summer of 1867, an extraordinarily challenging time for Monet personally. Earlier in the year, upon learning that his companion, Camille Doncieux, was pregnant, Monet had moved into his aunt’s home in Sainte-Adresse. In order to shield his disapproving family from the situation, he discreetly shuttled back and forth to Paris, where he had arranged for Camille to be cared for. Despite (or perhaps because of) his complicated personal life, Monet was productive during this period: by the end of June, he wrote from Sainte-Adresse to the painter Frédéric Bazille that he had “twenty or so canvases well under way, stunning seacapes, figures, and gardens, something of everything in fact.”[11] It was not the first time Monet had painted the coast of Normandy, or specifically Sainte-Adresse, however. Just two years earlier, he had made his debut at the 1865 Paris Salon with two large, ambitious seascapes of the region—the Kimbell Art Museum’s La Pointe de la Hève at Low Tide (fig. 13.4 [W52]), a picture depicting the Sainte-Adresse beach looking northward; and the Norton Simon Museum’s Mouth of the Seine at Honfleur (fig. 13.5 [W51]), which portrays Honfleur, situated at the mouth of the Seine across from Le Havre.[12] These two works—largely praised by Salon critics—were painted in Monet’s studio and based on smaller oil studies on canvas that he had previously made on location.[13] Notably, in the Salon compositions as well as other paintings he made around this time, the artist downplayed the ongoing resort development in Normandy. With their rather muted, gray-and-brown-infused palettes, Monet’s early seascapes predominantly depict brooding natural environments and feature Normandy’s beaches and terrain as the workplaces of its local inhabitants and fishermen.[14]3
Fig. 13.4
Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926). La Pointe de la Hève at Low Tide, 1865. Oil on canvas; 90.2 × 150.5 cm (35 1/2 × 59 1/4 in.). Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, Texas, AP 1968.07.
Fig. 13.5
Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926). Mouth of the Seine at Honfleur, 1865. Oil on canvas; 89.5 × 150.5 cm (35 1/4 × 59 1/4 in.). The Norton Simon Foundation, F.1973.33.2.P. Image courtesy of The Norton Simon Foundation.
Monet’s seascapes from the summer of 1867, however, proved to be markedly different from those he had painted only a couple of years earlier. Beach exemplifies his evolving painting technique at this time and foreshadows some of the qualities that would later become characteristic of the Impressionist movement; indeed, the fact that Monet was represented by the painting at the second Impressionist exhibition in 1876—nearly ten years after it was executed—is a testament to this. Perhaps the most striking change apparent in Monet’s work from the summer of 1867 is that, unlike his earlier coastal landscapes, he painted Beach en plein air. Complaining of the difficulty of painting in this way, he wrote to Bazille in July: “I am losing my sight. …I can barely see after working for half an hour; the doctor told me that I had to stop painting out of doors.”[15] The severe glare and changing weather conditions Monet experienced undoubtedly contributed to the choices of colors he used in creating these pictures. Indeed, the palette of Beach is blonder and brighter than those of his 1865 Salon seascapes. This is in large part the result of the artist’s use of a lighter and cooler palette and his incorporation of more colorful elements into the composition (see Technical Report).4
The paintings Monet executed in Sainte-Adresse in the summer of 1867 also differ from his earlier depictions in terms of their subject matter, for these pictures comprise the artist’s “first sustained campaign of painting that involved tourism.”[16] The viewer is immediately drawn to the visible aspects of local life in Beach—dark-sailed fishing boats drift in the water, and other beached crafts are surrounded by fishermen and their equipment. The two groups of boats frame two figures sitting on the shoreline: a man in a dark hat and suit looking out through his telescope, accompanied by a woman wearing a yellow hat with a red ribbon (fig. 13.6). The woman’s dress—perhaps the composition’s brightest element—further captures the viewer’s gaze; in this, one of the few areas of notable impasto in the painting, Monet constructed the garment out of a few strokes of almost pure lead white paint. Upon recognizing the couple—undoubtedly vacationers, given their attire—our view of the painting’s narrative changes. As aptly noted by Robert L. Herbert, “We are obliged to convert a traditional seacoast scene to one that has been invaded by modern life.”[17]
5
Fig. 13.6
Detail of Monet’s The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (1867). The Art Institute of Chicago, 1933.439.
New Observations
The Beach at Sainte-Adresse is often considered to be a pendant to Monet’s Regatta at Sainte-Adresse (fig. 13.7 [W91]), also executed during the summer of 1867 and now in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.[18] Although there is no evidence that the artist wanted to exhibit or sell these paintings as a pair, Regatta was painted on a canvas very close in size to the Art Institute’s work, and both depict the same portion of the Sainte-Adresse beach and include signs—notably a new villa atop the hill at left and the presence of vacationers—of the physical and social transformations taking place at the resort destination.[19] Although many scholars have noted the complementary nature of these two paintings and the fact that each picture references the coexistence of local and tourist life at Sainte-Adresse, Beach is dominated by fishermen and dark-sailed ketches, while Regatta is populated with urban tourists and white-sailed leisure yachts.[20] Furthermore, the former has a slightly sketchier paint quality and depicts the water at low tide with an overcast sky; in contrast, the compositional elements of Regatta seem more finished, and it portrays a sunny day at high tide.
6
Fig. 13.7
Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926). Regatta at Sainte-Adresse, 1867. Oil on canvas; 75.2 × 101.6 cm (29 5/8 × 40 in.). The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, bequest of William Church Osborn, 1951 (51.30.4). Image copyright © The Metropolitan Museum of Art/Art Resource, NY.
Recent technical analysis has revealed, however, that Monet did not always intend for local life to dominate Beach; in fact, there are a number of indications that the Art Institute’s composition was originally closer to that of the Metropolitan Museum’s painting than has been previously recognized. Infrared imaging reveals that in an earlier stage of the Art Institute’s canvas there was a group of four or five figures on the shoreline at the right side of the painting: furthest to the right were a man and woman, to their left were two men (one standing and one possibly seated), and to their left was perhaps another seated figure (fig. 13.8). Although it is difficult to determine the specific details of their clothing, it is clear that they represent a group of city-dwelling vacationers: the woman, located second from the right, wears a long dress, and three of the accompanying figures clearly sport hats, the silhouettes of which resemble those of the tourists in Regatta. Moreover, these figures face the water much the same way that the tourists depicted in the Metropolitan Museum’s picture look out onto the English Channel to watch the regatta. These well-dressed figures were clearly the prominent human element in the original composition and were painted on a scale similar to or slightly larger than the three fishermen at left, which were late additions to Beach. It is notable that traces of charcoal were identified near the heads of these fishermen, suggesting a possible underdrawing and bringing to mind Monet’s graphic works—like Cliffs and Sea, Sainte-Adresse (fig. 13.9, cat. 12)—of the same period.
7
Fig. 13.8
Infrared reflectogram (Surface Optics, 1646 nm) and transmitted-infrared (Fuji, 1.0–1.1 µm) details of Monet’s The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (1867). The Art Institute of Chicago, 1933.439. Interactive image.
Fig. 13.9
Claude Monet (French, 1840–1926). Cliffs and Sea, Sainte-Adresse, 1865. Black chalk on off-white laid paper; 206 × 314 mm (8 1/8 × 12 3/8 in.). The Art Institute of Chicago, Clarence Buckingham Collection, 1987.56.
Infrared imaging and X-radiography of Beach reveal other compositional changes as well. At an earlier stage of the composition Monet included an additional cluster of boats in the water along the right side of the canvas (fig. 13.10). Although subsequently painted out, these earlier crafts had sails that were similar in form and scale to those of the small- and medium-size leisure yachts in Regatta, although none equaled the size of the largest boat in the foreground of the Metropolitan Museum’s painting. More importantly, however, the sails on the earlier boats in Beach were white, indicating that they were pleasure boats, not dark-sailed fishing boats like those that appear in the final composition. By painting out these original white-sailed boats and replacing them with working boats, Monet changed the narrative of the painting from one that foregrounded the leisure class to one that features local life at Sainte-Adresse.
8
Fig. 13.10
X-ray and infrared reflectogram (Surface Optics, 1646 nm) details of Monet’s The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (1867). The Art Institute of Chicago, 1933.439. Interactive image.
When Monet wrote to Bazille in June 1867, he described that “among my seascapes, I’m painting the regattas at Le Havre with lots of people on the beach and the ship lane covered with small sails.”[21] While the Metropolitan Museum’s Regatta fits neatly into this characterization, it has always been difficult to reconcile the subject matter of Beach with Monet’s description, since the painting’s subject has little to do with regattas or the tourist population that gathered to watch them. The presence of vacationers and white-sailed boats in an earlier stage of the painting, however, suggests that Monet began the Art Institute’s picture within the framework that he outlined to Bazille and did not originally intend Beach and Regatta to vary to such a significant degree. It was only at a later stage in his painting process that Monet deliberately complicated the meaning of Beach and, more significantly, the dialogue it shares with the Metropolitan Museum’s picture.
Gloria Groom and Jill Shaw9
- The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (W92) corresponds to Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vol. 2, Nos. 1–968 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996), p. 49, cat. 92 (ill.). The Art Institute currently uses the title that was given to the painting when it was exhibited at the second Impressionist exhibition. The painting had the following titles during the lifetime of the artist:
Feb. 28, 1873: Marine, temps gris (Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1868–73 [no. 2585]; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago).
Possibly spring 1874: Ste Adresse near Havre (Durand-Ruel, London, Eighth Exhibition of the Society of French Artists, exh. cat. [Durand-Ruel, 1874], p. 11, cat. 142; according to Henri Loyrette and Gary Tinterow, Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, exh. cat. [Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 1994], p. 430, cat. 136, translated as Gary Tinterow and Henri Loyrette, Origins of Impressionism, exh. cat. [Metropolitan Museum of Art/Abrams, 1994], p. 433, cat. 136).
Apr. 1876: La Plage à Sainte-Adresse. (Catalogue de la 2e exposition de peinture [second Impressionist exhibition], exh. cat. [Alcan-Lévy, 1876], cat. 151).
June 21, 1889: Sainte-Adresse. 1867. (Galerie Georges Petit, Claude Monet; A. Rodin, exh. cat. [Imp. de l’Art, E. Ménard, 1889], p. 27, cat. 5; reprinted in Theodore Reff, ed., Miscellaneous Group Exhibitions, Modern Art in Paris 34 [Garland, 1981], n.pag.).
Jan. 9, 1893: Sainte-Adresse (Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1891 [no. 2585]; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago).
Feb. 1–2, 1897: Sainte-Adresse. (Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, Collection H. V.: Catalogue de tableaux modernes de premier ordre: Pastels, aquarelles, dessins, sale cat. [Galerie Georges Petit, Feb. 1–2, 1897], p. 109, lot 79).
June 11, 1920: Sainte-Adresse, 1867 (Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1921 [no. 11701]; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago).
Feb. 8, 1923: Sainte-Adresse, 1867 (Durand-Ruel, New York, deposit book for 1894–1925 [no. 8044]; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago).
- The following texts were extremely beneficial in understanding the changing landscape of Normandy and the way in which Monet and other Impressionists treated its sites and subjects: Robert L. Herbert, Monet on the Normandy Coast: Tourism and Painting, 1867–1886 (Yale University Press, 1994); Richard Brettell’s essays in Heather Lemonedes, Lynn Federle Orr, and David Steel, Monet in Normandy, exh. cat. (Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco/North Carolina Museum of Art/Cleveland Museum of Art, 2006); and John House and David M. Hopkin, Impressionists by the Sea, exh. cat. (Royal Academy of Arts, London, 2007). For a detailed chronology of Monet’s life, see Charles F. Stuckey, with the assistance of Sophia Shaw, Claude Monet, 1840–1926, exh. cat. (Art Institute of Chicago/Thames & Hudson, 1995).
- Richard R. Brettell, “Monet’s Normandy before Monet,” in Heather Lemonedes, Lynn Federle Orr, and David Steel, Monet in Normandy, exh. cat. (Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco/North Carolina Museum of Art/Cleveland Museum of Art, 2006), p. 15.
- Eugène Chapus, De Paris à Rouen et au Havre (L. Hachette, 1862), p. 244; quoted in John House and David M. Hopkin, Impressionists by the Sea, exh. cat. (Royal Academy of Arts, London, 2007), p. 125.
- Eugène d’Auriac, Guide pratique, historique et descriptif aux bains de mer de la manche et de l’océan (Garnier Frères, 1866), p. 200; quoted in John House and David M. Hopkin, Impressionists by the Sea, exh. cat. (Royal Academy of Arts, London, 2007), p. 125.
- John House and David M. Hopkin, Impressionists by the Sea, exh. cat. (Royal Academy of Arts, London, 2007), pp. 15–16. Alphonse Karr’s 1836 novel Le chemin le plus court, which tells the story of a young painter from Le Havre, references numerous local sites. Karr also published Les soirées de Sainte-Adresse in 1853.
- Michel Schulman, Frédéric Bazille, 1841–1870: Catalogue raisonné, peintures, dessins, pastels, aquarelles (Éd. de l’Amateur/Éd. des Catalogues Raisonnés, 1995), cat. 18 (1865).
- Alfred Robaut, L’oeuvre de Corot: Catalogue raisonné et illustré, précédé de l’histoire de Corot et de ses oeuvres, vol. 2 (1905; repr., Laget, 1965), nos. 230, 235, and 238–39. All of these works are dated to the period 1830–40.
- Adolphe Stein et al., Jongkind: Catalogue critique de l’oeuvre (Brame & Lorenceau, 2003), nos. 50 (1847), 116 (1853), 216 (1858), 271 (1862), 272 (1862), 273 (1862), 274 (1862), 309 (1863), and 430 (1866).
- As early as 1850, photographic studios began to be established in towns along the coast of Normandy. Among the numerous photographers documenting the region was Gustave Le Gray, who made a series of photographs there during the summers of 1856 and 1858. Many of Le Gray’s views documented the transformation of the coastline. He was pioneering in his technical skill and creation of atmospheric photographs that presented little or no narrative context. Le Gray’s sea views were acclaimed in London and Paris, and it has been argued that Monet certainly would have known about these photographs, which may have played a role in his (and other Impressionists’) treatment of subjects and their interest in capturing the momentary. See Carole McNamara, “Painting and Photography in Normandy: The Aesthetic of the Instant,” in The Lens of Impressionism: Photography and Painting along the Normandy Coast, 1850–1874, exh. cat. (University of Michigan Museum of Art/Hudson Hills, 2009), pp. 15–33. Indeed, there is a certain affinity between Le Gray’s photograph The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (fig. 13.2) and Monet’s painting.
- Monet to Bazille, June 25, [1867]; quoted in Richard Kendall, ed., Monet by Himself: Paintings, Drawings, Pastels, Letters, trans. Bridget Strevens Romer (Macdonald Orbis, 1989), p. 24; original French in Daniel Wildenstein, Claude Monet: Biographie et catalogue raisonné, vol. 1, Peintures, 1840–1881 (Bibliothèque des Arts, 1974), pp. 423–24, letter 33.
- The number preceded by a W refers to the Monet catalogue raisonné; see Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vols. 1–4 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996).
- See Richard R. Brettell and Stephen Eisenman, Nineteenth-Century Art in the Norton Simon Museum (Norton Simon Art Foundation/Yale University Press, 2006), pp. 316–20, cat. 84. According to Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vol. 2, Nos. 1–968 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996), p. 24, cat. 40, Horses at the Pointe de La Hève (1864; private collection [W40]) is the study for the Kimbell painting; and cat. 38, The Lighthouse by the Hospice (1864; Kunsthaus Zürich [W38]), is the study for the Norton Simon painting. The number preceded by a W refers to the Monet catalogue raisonné; see Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vols. 1–4 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996).
- Richard R. Brettell, “Monet and Normandy,” in Heather Lemonedes, Lynn Federle Orr, and David Steel, Monet in Normandy, exh. cat. (Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco/North Carolina Museum of Art/Cleveland Museum of Art, 2006), pp. 42–43.
- Monet to Bazille, July 3, [1867]; quoted in Gary Tinterow, “Regatta at Sainte-Adresse,” in Masterpieces of European Painting, 1800–1920, in The Metropolitan Museum of Art (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York/Yale University Press, 2007), p. 136; original French in Daniel Wildenstein, Claude Monet: Biographie et catalogue raisonné, vol. 1, Peintures, 1840–1881 (Bibliothèque des Arts, 1974), p. 424, letter 34.
- Robert L. Herbert, Monet on the Normandy Coast: Tourism and Painting, 1867–1886 (Yale University Press, 1994), p. 9.
- Robert L. Herbert, Monet on the Normandy Coast: Tourism and Painting, 1867–1886 (Yale University Press, 1994), p. 11.
- The number preceded by a W refers to the Monet catalogue raisonné; see Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vols. 1–4 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996).
- These details have been noted in a number of texts, including Robert L. Herbert, Monet on the Normandy Coast: Tourism and Painting, 1867–1886 (Yale University Press, 1994); Heather Lemonedes, Lynn Federle Orr, and David Steel, Monet in Normandy, exh. cat. (Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco/North Carolina Museum of Art/Cleveland Museum of Art, 2006); Gary Tinterow, “Regatta at Sainte-Adresse,” in Masterpieces of European Painting, 1800–1920, in The Metropolitan Museum of Art (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York/Yale University Press, 2007), p. 136; John House and David M. Hopkin, Impressionists by the Sea, exh. cat. (Royal Academy of Arts, London, 2007), pp. 130–31; and Joseph Baillio, “Monet à Sainte-Adresse en 1867,” in Réunion des Musées Nationaux, Claude Monet, 1840–1926, exh. cat. (Réunion des Musées Nationaux/Abrams, 2010), p. 54.
- The only reference to the local fisherfolk in Regatta is the small, dark-sailed boat in the center of the composition. Robert L. Herbert pointed out that yachts could be distinguished from fishing boats by the color of their sails: fishing boats typically had brown sails, and yachts, which were more expensive, had white sails. See Robert L. Herbert, Impressionism: Art, Leisure, and Parisian Society (Yale University Press, 1988), p. 292.
- Monet to Bazille, June 25, [1867], quoted in Richard Kendall, ed., Monet by Himself: Paintings, Drawings, Pastels, Letters, trans. Bridget Strevens Romer (Macdonald Orbis, 1989), p. 24; original French in Daniel Wildenstein, Claude Monet: Biographie et catalogue raisonné, vol. 1, Peintures, 1840–1881 (Bibliothèque des Arts, 1974), pp. 423–24, letter 33.
- For an overview of the materials and methods of Claude Monet’s paintings in the Art Institute of Chicago, see Kimberley Muir, Inge Fiedler, Don H. Johnson, and Robert G. Erdmann, “An In-depth Study of the Materials and Technique of Paintings by Claude Monet from the Art Institute of Chicago,” ICOM-CC 17th Triennial Meeting Preprints, Melbourne, Sept. 15–19, 2014 (forthcoming).
- Using the toolbar at the bottom right, any two images of the painting may be selected for comparison by clicking the layers icon to the right of the slider bar. The slider bar may be moved to transition back and forth between the two chosen images. The jagged line icon brings up a list of available annotations, or colored lines that show the significant features visible in each image, which may be turned on or off in any combination. For example, the red annotation lines, associated with the natural-light image, trace some of the painting’s key compositional features. When overlaid onto a technical image (X-ray, raking light, UV, etc.), the red outlines help the viewer to better observe how features in the technical image relate to or diverge from the painting as seen with the naked eye. (When annotations are turned on, a legend appears in the upper right showing each color and its associated image type.) The circular arrow icon returns the image to the default settings (natural light, full-image view, natural-light [red] annotation on). The four-arrow icon toggles between the view of the image in the page and a full-screen view of the image. In the upper right corner, the vertical slider bar may be moved to zoom into or out of the image; different parts of the image can be accessed by clicking and dragging within the image itself. The icon in the upper left corner opens a small view of the full image, within which a red box indicates the portion of the overall image being viewed when zooming is enabled.
- XRF analysis, in conjunction with microscopic examination of the painting surface, indicates that the paint mixture for the signature (t) contains iron oxide pigments, viridian, and possibly bone black. Other pigments may also be present. See Kimberley Muir, “Mon_SAdresse_33_439_XRF_Results,” Aug. 28, 2009, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- XRF analysis, in conjunction with microscopic examination of the painting surface, indicates that the paint mixture for the date (7) contains cobalt blue, vermilion, iron oxide pigments, and viridian. Other pigments may also be present. See Kimberley Muir, “Mon_SAdresse_33_439_XRF_Results,” Aug. 28, 2009, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- It is interesting to note the difference in signature styles between this painting and the contemporary Regatta at Sainte-Adresse (1867; Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York [W91]). The number preceded by a W refers to the Monet catalogue raisonné; see Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vols. 1–4 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996).
- Flax was confirmed by microscopic cross-sectional fiber identification. See Inge Fiedler, “1933_439_Monet_analytical_report,” Sept. 23, 2011, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Original dimensions were determined by approximating foldover edges based on creases and old tack holes. Small discrepancies between the current measurements and standard sizes may be a result of this approximation, in addition to restretching, lining, slacking, and keying out of the canvas over time.
- Thread count and weave information were determined by Thread Count Automation Project software; see Don H. Johnson and Robert G. Erdmann, “Thread Count Report: Claude Monet, The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (W92/1933.439),” July 2011, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The presence of a sizing layer is difficult to determine from cross sections due to previous conservation treatments, including an aqueous lining and a wax-resin lining.
- The ground composition was analyzed using SEM/EDX, PLM, and XRF. See Inge Fiedler, “1933_439_Monet_analytical_report,” Sept. 23, 2011; and Kimberley Muir, “Mon_SAdresse_33_439_XRF_Results,” Aug. 28, 2009, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Research on the collection of Impressionist paintings at the Wallraf-Richartz-Museum and Fondation Corboud in Cologne has detected similar traces of charcoal underdrawing in works by Monet and some of his contemporaries. It is noted that the “lines were easy to blow or brush away during the painting process. For this reason, the extent of the sketch (which can often only be demonstrated under a microscope) is in many cases practically imperceptible.” Iris Schaefer, Caroline von Saint-George, and Katja Lewerentz, Painting Light: The Hidden Techniques of the Impressionists (Skira, 2008), p. 102.
- Charcoal was identified by PLM. See Inge Fiedler, “1933_439_Monet_analytical_report,” Sept. 23, 2011, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- In the transmitted-infrared image, the light, which is positioned behind the painting, is blocked at the edges by the stretcher bars, making the couple at the far right difficult to discern.
- The pigments were identified by the following methods: lead white, bone black, cobalt blue (XRF, PLM, SEM/EDX); iron oxide (red, yellow, and reddish-brown), chrome yellow, viridian, emerald green, vermilion (XRF, PLM); and red lake (PLM). Analysis was carried out on selected areas and may not include all pigments present in the painting. For more detailed results and conditions used, see Kimberley Muir, “Mon_SAdresse_33_439_XRF_Results,” Aug. 28, 2009; and Inge Fiedler, “1933_439_Monet_analytical_report,” Sept. 23, 2011, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago. A significant zinc peak was detected by XRF in one area of the painting: the yellow band of the fishing boat at left. No zinc white was identified by PLM analysis of the same area. The zinc could be due to an additive, such as zinc stearate, included by the paint manufacturer. See Kimberley Muir, “Mon_SAdresse_33_439_XRF_Results,” Aug. 28, 2009, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The binding medium was not analyzed. The estimation of an oil medium is based on visual examination, as well as on knowledge of Monet’s technique and published analyses of Monet paintings in other collections. See, for example, David Bomford, Jo Kirby, John Leighton, and Ashok Roy, Art in the Making: Impressionism, exh. cat. (National Gallery, London/Yale University Press, 1990), pp. 72–75.
- See Louis Pomerantz, examination report, June 28, 1957, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- See unsigned note, July 1, 1957, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- See Alfred Jakstas, treatment report, Aug. 22, 1973, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Kirk Vuillemot, “Monet Frame Descriptions Final,” Dec. 3, 2013, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Kirk Vuillemot, “Monet Frame Descriptions Final,” Dec. 3, 2013, on file in the Conservation Department, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The photograph showing The Beach at Sainte-Adresse in the interior of Mrs. Lewis Larned (Annie Swan) Coburn’s Blackstone Hotel apartment in Chicago dates to before April 6, 1932, when the painting was exhibited in the Art Institute of Chicago’s Exhibition of the Mrs. L. L. Coburn Collection: Modern Paintings and Watercolors, April 6–October 9, 1932. Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago. Mrs. Coburn died in May 1932 during the course of the exhibition, and the paintings remained at the Art Institute after it ended.
- The transaction is recorded in the Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1868–73 (no. 2585, as Marine, temps gris): “Acheté par Durand-Ruel Paris (stock 2585) à l’artiste le 28 février 1873 pour 400 francs, Marine, temps gris,” as confirmed by Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- According to Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vol. 2, Nos. 1–968 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996), p. 49, cat. 92. Wildenstein explains that Durand-Ruel probably sold the painting to Faure around 1876. Agnès Lacau St. Guily (Wildenstein Institute, Paris), in an e-mail message to Gloria Groom, July 27, 2011, noted: “For W 92, a written note in the file indicates that the provenance DR / Faure / DR / Vever / Sale Vever / Boulley for Georges Kohn (without confusion with French writer Gustave Kahn) comes from the Durand-Ruel archives.” La Plage à Sainte-Adresse is listed as “appartient à M. Faure” in Catalogue de la 2e exposition de peinture [second Impressionist exhibition], exh. cat. (Alcan-Lévy, 1876), cat. 151. According to the Durand-Ruel Archives, however, there is no documentation confirming that Faure purchased the painting from Durand-Ruel; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The transaction is recorded in the Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1891 (no. 2585, as Sainte-Adresse): “Acheté par Durand-Ruel Paris (stock 2585) à Faure le 9 janvier 1893 pour 7000 francs, Sainte-Adresse,” as confirmed by Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago. This provenance is also noted in Anthea Callen, “Jean-Baptiste Faure, 1830–1914: A Study of a Patron and Collector of the Impressionists and Their Contemporaries with a Catalogue of His Collection” (M.A. thesis, University of Leicester, 1971), p. 325, n. 3.
- The transaction is recorded in the Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1891 (no. 2585, as Sainte-Adresse): “Vendu par Durand-Ruel Paris (stock 2585) à Véver, Paris, le 17 janvier 1893 pour 8000 francs, Sainte-Adresse,” as confirmed by Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago. Anthea Callen suggested that Durand-Ruel might have sold the painting for 12,000 francs; Callen found no recorded selling price in the Durand-Ruel stock book (no. L.2585), but the asking price at the time was listed as 12,000 francs. See Anthea Callen, “Jean-Baptiste Faure, 1830–1914: A Study of a Patron and Collector of the Impressionists and Their Contemporaries with a Catalogue of His Collection” (M.A. thesis, University of Leicester, 1971), p. 325, n. 3.
- See Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, Collection H. V.: Catalogue de tableaux modernes de premier ordre, pastels, aquarelles, dessins, sale cat. (Galerie Georges Petit, Feb. 1–2, 1897), p. 109, lot 79. A sale catalogue annotated with prices and names is in the Rijksbureau voor Kunsthistorische Documentatie, The Hague. According to Henri Loyrette and Gary Tinterow, Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, exh. cat. (Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 1994), p. 430, cat. 136 (translated as Gary Tinterow and Henri Loyrette, Origins of Impressionism, exh. cat. [Metropolitan Museum of Art/Abrams, 1994], pp. 432–33, cat. 136), it was purchased by Boulley for Gustave Kahn. According to Daniel Wildenstein, Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vol. 2, Nos. 1–968 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996), p. 49, cat. 92, it was purchased by Boulley for Georges Kohn. Agnès Lacau St. Guily (Wildenstein Institute, Paris), in an e-mail message to Gloria Groom, July 27, 2011, stated that the painting was purchased by “Boulley for Georges Kohn (without confusion with French writer Gustave Kahn).” The Durand-Ruel Archives also confirms that the painting was “acheté à G. Kohn (et non pas Kahn)”; see Paul-Louis Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The transaction is recorded in the Durand-Ruel, Paris, stock book for 1921 (no. 11701, as Sainte-Adresse): “Acheté en compte à demi (stock 11701) par Durand-Ruel Paris et Bernheim-Jeune à Georges Kohn, Paris, le 11 juin 1920 pour 40,000 francs (prix pour la totalité du tableau), Sainte-Adresse,” as confirmed by Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago. This letter also clarifies that “Durand-Ruel et Bernheim-Jeune achètent ensemble à Kohn le 11 juin 1920 mais nous ne savons pas quand Durand-Ruel rachète la moitié de Bernheim-Jeune, ni à combien.”
- The price that Coburn paid for the painting is unknown. The transaction is recorded in the Durand-Ruel, New York, deposit book for 1894–1925 (no. 8044, as Sainte-Adresse): “Vendu par Durand-Ruel New York à A. S. Coburn le 8 février 1923, Sainte-Adresse,” as confirmed by Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, dated Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago. See also a letter on Durand-Ruel letterhead, Mar. 18, 1932, verifying that Coburn purchased the painting from Durand-Ruel.
- According to Gary Tinterow’s entry for this painting in Henri Loyrette and Gary Tinterow, Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, exh. cat. (Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 1994), p. 430, cat. 136, translated as Gary Tinterow and Henri Loyrette, Origins of Impressionism, exh. cat. (Metropolitan Museum of Art/Abrams, 1994), p. 433, cat. 136. Charles Stuckey notes that the exhibition occurred in April; Charles F. Stuckey, with the assistance of Sophia Shaw, Claude Monet, 1840–1926, exh. cat. (Art Institute of Chicago/Thames & Hudson, 1995), p. 199. The gallery that Durand-Ruel rented at 168 New Bond Street, London, was known as the German Gallery; see Kenneth McConkey, “Impressionism in Britain,” in Kenneth McConkey and Anna Gruetzner Robins, Impressionism in Britain, exh. cat. (Barbican Art Gallery, 1995), p. 209, n. 19.
- This exhibition catalogue was reprinted in Theodore Reff, ed., Miscellaneous Group Exhibitions, Modern Art in Paris 34 (Garland, 1981), n.pag. The dates of this exhibition are unclear. The Musée Rodin reports that the exhibition was held from June 21 to August 1889; see Musée Rodin, Claude Monet; Auguste Rodin: Centenaire de l’exposition de 1889, exh. cat. (Musée Rodin, 1989), p. 19. Roger Terry Dunn found evidence that the exhibition lasted for three months; see Dunn, “The Monet-Rodin Exhibition at the Galerie Georges Petit in 1889” (Ph.D. diss., Northwestern University, 1978), pp. 74–76. The dates used in the present catalogue reflect Dunn’s research and those also used in Charles F. Stuckey, with the assistance of Sophia Shaw, Claude Monet, 1840–1926, exh. cat. (Art Institute of Chicago/Thames & Hudson, 1995), p. 218.
- The exhibition catalogue lists the dates as June 1–November 1, 1933, but newspaper articles confirm the exhibition opened on May 23. See India Moffett, “Art Show of 1,500 World Famous Treasures Is Opened at Institute,” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 23, 1933, p. 17; and Virginia Gardner, “Record Throng of 1,367,000 Views Art Show,” Chicago Daily Tribune, Oct. 29, 1933, p. 7.
- There was no catalogue produced for the exhibition, but a typewritten checklist in the Saint Louis Art Museum Archives includes The Beach at Sainte-Adresse. Exhibition dates were published in the Bulletin of the City Art Museum of St. Louis 19, 2 (Apr. 1934), p. 27. Thanks to Clare Vasquez, public services librarian, Richardson Library, Saint Louis Art Museum, for sending this documentation, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The exhibition catalogue lists the dates as June 1–November 1, 1934, but newspaper articles confirm that the exhibition closed on October 31. See “Fair Art Exhibition Closes Forever at 5:30 This Afternoon,” Chicago Daily Tribune, Oct. 31, 1934, p. 2; and “Shippers Start Dismantling Art Exhibition Today,” Chicago Daily Tribune, Nov. 1, 1934, p. 3.
- Toledo (Ohio) Museum of Art, Catalogue: French Impressionists and Post-Impressionists, exh. cat. (Toledo Museum of Art, 1934), lists the exhibition dates as November 1934. Shipping out order 19801, on file in Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago, indicates the exhibition lasted from November 4 to 25, 1934.
- Thanks to Nicole R. Myers, associate curator, European Painting and Sculpture, Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, for locating the exhibition catalogue, a copy of which is in the curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago. See also William Rockhill Nelson Gallery of Art and Atkins Museum of Fine Arts, “Exhibition of French Impressionist Landscape Paintings,” William Rockhill Nelson Gallery of Art and Atkins Museum of Fine Arts News Flashes 3, 2 (Dec. 1, 1936), p. 2.
- See Art Institute of Chicago, “List of Exhibitions,” Bulletin of the Art Institute of Chicago 39, 4 (Apr.–May 1945), p. 64. See also the typewritten document, “Masterpiece of the Month: Notes and Bibliography, January 1942–December 1945,” pp. 111–13. Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The exhibition catalogue is printed in Art Institute of Chicago, “Catalogue,” Art Institute of Chicago Quarterly 51, 2 (Apr. 1, 1957), pp. 33–34. Under “Exhibitions” in the same issue, the original exhibition dates were listed as April 1–30 (p. 36); however, the show was extended until June 15. See Edith Weigle, “The Wonderful World of Art,” Chicago Daily Tribune, May 26, 1957, p. E2, for an exhibition review and reference to the extension of the length of the show. The April 1957 issue of the Art Institute of Chicago Quarterly was largely dedicated to the Monet works in the Art Institute’s collection. The exhibition marked the first time the Art Institute’s thirty Monet paintings were shown together in the museum.
- According to shipping out order A7603, on file in Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago. The exhibition at the California Palace of the Legion of Honor is mentioned in California Palace of the Legion of Honor, “Exhibitions,” Bulletin of the California Palace of the Legion of Honor 19, 9–10 (Jan.–Feb. 1962), n.pag. A typescript of the list of paintings shown at the Santa Barbara Museum of Art (curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago) includes The Beach at Sainte-Adresse. Arthur Millier, “Summer Relief: ‘Painters by the Sea,’” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 27, 1961, p. N18, illustrates the painting.
- According to documentation on file in Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago.
- According to Gary Tinterow’s entry for this painting in Henri Loyrette and Gary Tinterow, Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, exh. cat. (Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 1994), p. 430, cat. 136; translated as Gary Tinterow and Henri Loyrette, Origins of Impressionism, exh. cat. (Metropolitan Museum of Art/Abrams, 1994), p. 433, cat. 136. The title of the painting is not mentioned in this article.
- According to Gary Tinterow’s entry for this painting in Henri Loyrette and Gary Tinterow, Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, exh. cat. (Réunion des Musées Nationaux, 1994), p. 430, cat. 136; translated as Gary Tinterow and Henri Loyrette, Origins of Impressionism, exh. cat. (Metropolitan Museum of Art/Abrams, 1994), p. 433, cat. 136.
- The painting is not titled in the article, but it is described as “la plage de Ste-Adresse.”
- Berson noted that this article is a reprint of Gustave Rivière, “Les intransigeants de la peinture,” L’esprit moderne (Apr. 13, 1876). The painting is not titled in the article, but it is described as “une marine avec un bateau bleu sur la plage.”
- As mentioned in Daniel Wildenstein, Claude Monet: Catalogue raisonné/Werkverzeichnis, vol. 2, Nos. 1–968 (Taschen/Wildenstein Institute, 1996), p. 49, cat. 92, Geffroy cited an 1876 article (author unknown) that mentions The Beach at Sainte-Adresse (p. 71).
- Republished in Art Institute of Chicago, A Brief Illustrated Guide to the Collections (Art Institute of Chicago, 1941), p. 35; and Art Institute of Chicago, An Illustrated Guide to the Collections of the Art Institute of Chicago (Art Institute of Chicago, 1945), pp. 36 (ill.), 37.
- Also included in the abridged translation into Russian in Oscar Reuterswärd, Klod Mone: Sokrashchennyi perevod so shvedskogo [Claude Monet: An abridged translation from Swedish] (Progress, 1965), p. 171, pl. 11.
- Republished in Kenneth Clark, Landscape into Art (Harper & Row, 1976), pp. xiv; 168, pl. 100.
- Included in typescript catalogue supplement, Nov. 15, 1966, p. 41; typescript catalogue supplement, Sept. 15, 1967, p. 41; typescript catalogue supplement, Dec. 18, 1968, p. 61; typescript catalogue supplement, Feb. 10, 1971, p. 77; typescript catalogue supplement, Apr. 15, 1971, p. [6]; and typescript catalogue supplement, Apr. 15, 1972, Institutional Archives, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The Beach at Sainte-Adresse is listed as plate 62, but images do not accompany the Art Institute’s copy of this dissertation.
- Republished in John Maxon, The Art Institute of Chicago, rev. ed. (Abrams, 1977), pp. 80 (ill.), 81; and Maxon, The Art Institute of Chicago (Thames & Hudson, 1987), pp. 80 (ill.), 81.
- The Beach at Sainte-Adresse is listed as figure 10, but images do not accompany the Art Institute’s copy of this thesis.
- Denis Rouart, “Appearances and Reflections,” in Denis Rouart and Jean-Dominique Rey, Monet, Water Lilies: The Complete Series, trans. David Radzinowicz, with a cat. rais. by Julie Rouart (Flammarion/Rizzoli, 2008), pp. 36, 38. It was simultaneously revised and published in French as Denis Rouart and Jean-Dominique Rey, Monet, les nymphéas, with a cat. rais. by Julie Rouart (Flammarion, 2008).
- Also published as John House, “Framing the Landscape,” in John House, with contributions from Ann Dumas, Jane Mayo Roos, and James F. McMillan, Impressions of France: Monet, Renoir, Pissarro, and Their Rivals, ed. Timothy Wilcox and Margot Heller, exh. cat. (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, 1995), pp. 12; 15, fig. 1.
- Originally published in Italian in 2003 by Rizzoli/Skira-Corriere della Sera.
- See Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Located in the Durand-Ruel Archives; see Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- See Paul-Louis Durand-Ruel and Flavie Durand-Ruel, Durand-Ruel Archives, to the Art Institute of Chicago, Oct. 5, 2010, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- The label dates to the exhibition Impressionnisme: Les origines, 1859–1869, held at Galeries Nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, Apr. 19–Aug. 8, 1994.
- The label dates to 1999 according to invoice no. 9899 from Arnold Wiggins and Sons to the Art Institute, Aug. 19, 1999, curatorial object file, Art Institute of Chicago.
- See Don Johnson, C. Richard Johnson, Jr., Andrew G. Klein, William A. Sethares, H. Lee, and Ella Hendriks, “A Thread Counting Algorithm for Art Forensics,” 2009 IEEE Thirteenth Digital Signal Processing and Fifth IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop (IEEE, 2009), pp. 679–84; doi:10.1109/DSP.2009.4786009.
- See Damon M. Conover, John K. Delaney, Paola Ricciardi, and Murray H. Loew, “Towards Automatic Registration of Technical Images of Works of Art,” in Computer Vision and Image Analysis of Art II, ed. David G. Stork, James Coddington, and Anna Bentkowska-Kafel, Proc. SPIE 7869 (SPIE/IS&T, 2011), doi:10.1117/12.872634.
Entry by Gloria Groom and Jill Shaw; Technical Report by Kimberley Muir, “Cat. 13 The Beach at Sainte-Adresse, 1867,” in Monet Paintings and Drawings at the Art Institute of Chicago, ed. Gloria Groom and Jill Shaw, rev. ed. (2014; repr., Art Institute of Chicago, 2026), https://doi.org/10.53269/9780865592698/10.