The Serf
1900–03, cast c. 1908.[1]
Paris, 1900–03,[2] cast c. 1908[3]
Bronze; edition 1/10; 91.5 × 30.5 × 34.3 cm (36 × 12 × 13 1/2 in.)
Signed and numbered: Henri Matisse / 1/10 (top of base)
Inscribed: Le Serf (front of base)
Marked: A. BINGEN & COSTENOBLE./Fondeurs. Paris. (upper left, back of base)
The Art Institute of Chicago, Edward E. Ayer Endowment in memory of Charles L. Hutchinson, 1949.202
Between 1900 and 1903, Henri Matisse repeatedly reworked the soft and likely dampened clay of one of his earliest sculptures, The Serf, in what he reported to be up to five hundred studio sessions.[4] Outside of anatomical representation, he was searching for a constellation of elementary marks that together could evoke the human form. The artist’s approach responded to the work of Auguste Rodin and Paul Cézanne.[5] In 1899, one year before he began work on The Serf, Matisse purchased a plaster bust of the journalist Henri Rochefort by Rodin (1884–98; fig. 3.1) that had been in the collection of Édouard Manet and Cézanne’s Three Bathers (1879–82; fig. 3.2) from the dealer Ambroise Vollard.[6] Both works exemplify the use of a balanced synthesis of constructive marks to represent their subjects.[7] In Matisse’s early studio nudes, including Nude Study in Blue (c. 1899–1900; fig. 3.3) and Male Model—Sketch (c. 1900; fig. 3.4), he similarly experimented with shedding naturalism and increasingly used the simplified flat strokes of color that informed his approach in The Serf. He echoed themes from Rodin’s work by using the aging Italian model Giovanni Bevilacqua (sometimes spelled Bevilaqua), who resembled Cesidio Pignatelli, a model that Rodin used for a number of early works, including The Walking Man (c. 1900; fig. 3.5).[8] Matisse’s choice confounded peers such as the painter Jean Puy, who dismissed Bevilacqua as “an anthropoid” with “the face of an orang-outang [sic], half-hidden in his long hair and beard.”[9] Contrasting with the dynamic pose of The Walking Man, the heavy stance of the figure in The Serf remains firmly anchored to the ground. Instead of the fragmented pairing of anatomical and material marks in Rodin’s sculpture, Matisse adopted a holistic approach and evoked the body by creating visual correlations between gestural modeled forms.[10] In place of a naturalistic depiction of a collarbone or chest in The Serf, for example, he balanced concave slices above and below two lumpy masses over the figure’s stomach to accentuate the downward-facing head and angled pose of the body.1
Matisse’s work in sculpture informed his painting; however, The Serf also tested the expressive potential of abstract shapes and forms in the round. His comparably sized painting Male Model (c. 1900; fig. 3.6) shows Bevilacqua in a similar pose in wide brushstrokes of muted blue, green, and flesh tones.[11] To accentuate the stance of the figure in The Serf, which turns diagonally from the base, the artist added thick, textured masses to the upper back and belly to balance its exaggerated profile. As Matisse wrote in his “Notes d’un peintre” of 1908, the same year this work was cast, “what interests me most is neither still life nor landscape but the human figure . . . I do not insist upon all the details of the face, on setting them down one-by-one with anatomical exactitude. . . . I discover amid the lines of the face those which suggest the deep gravity that persists in every human being.”[12] In keeping with his statement, the artist distilled the human figure into modeled and cut surfaces in The Serf. A 1904 photograph of Matisse in his studio next to an earlier version of the sculpture (fig. 3.7) highlights one of the most dramatic changes the artist made: removing the figure’s arms. He likely had a two-part plaster mold produced from the original version of The Serf to create a plaster cast. When the artist moved to a new studio at the Hôtel Biron in 1908, which was also occupied by Rodin and became the Musée Rodin in 1919, the plaster cast reportedly suffered damage that may have resulted in the artist cutting off its arms before producing a piece mold for sand casting.[13] Alongside the accumulation of material on the trunk of the figure, the artist’s choice to cut off the arms calls attention to the core of the sculptural body and its careful balance of light-reflecting masses that embody the stark physicality of The Serf.2
Fig. 3.6
Henri Matisse (French, 1869–1954). Male Model, Paris, c. 1900. Oil on canvas; 99.3 × 72.7 cm (39 1/8 × 28 5/8 in.). The Museum of Modern Art, New York, Kay Sage Tanguy and Abby Aldrich Rockefeller Funds, 377.1975.
Fig. 3.7
Henri Matisse and The Serf (1900–03, cast c. 1908) with arms, c. 1904. Dr. Claribel and Miss Etta Cone Papers, Manuscripts Collections, The Baltimore Museum of Art. Photographer unknown.
This edition of The Serf, numbered 1 of 10, was cast by Bingen & Costenoble in Paris in the fall of 1908 for Matisse’s early supporters and close friends Michael and Sarah Stein of Paris and San Francisco (see fig. 3.8). It entered the collection of the Art Institute in 1949.[14]
Marin Sarvé-Tarr
3
Fig. 3.8
Henri Matisse’s sculpture class in the Couvent du Sacré-Cœur, boulevard des Invalides, Paris, c.1909. From left to right: Jean Heiberg, an unknown woman, Sarah Stein, Hans Purrmann, Henri Matisse, and Patrick Henry Bruce. Archives Henri Matisse, Paris. Photographer unknown.
- The work has had the following titles:Mar. 1948: The Slave (Jeffrey Smith writing on behalf of Sarah Stein, as quoted in Fiske Kimball, “Matisse: Recognition, Patronage, Collecting,” Philadelphia Museum Bulletin 43, no. 217 [Mar. 1948], p. 39.)
Apr. 1948: The Slave (Fiske Kimball, “Discovery from America,” ArtNews 47, no. 2 [Apr. 1948], p. 31.)
1951: The Slave (Le serf) and The Slave (Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Matisse: His Art and His Public [Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1951], pp. 305, 557.)
Nov. 1951: The Slave (Museum of Modern Art, Henri Matisse, exh. cat. [Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1951], p. 11, cat. 76; p. 14.)
1952: The Slave (Andrew Carnduff Ritchie, Sculpture of the Twentieth Century [Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1952], p. 58.)
Oct. 1952: The Slave (Museum of Modern Art, Sculpture of the Twentieth Century, exh. cat. [Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1952], p. 45, cat. 75.)
Feb. 1, 1953: The Slave (Andrew Carnduff Ritchie, “Sculpture of the Twentieth Century,” Art Institute of Chicago Quarterly 47, no. 1 [Feb. 1, 1953], p. 8.)
Sept. 1966: The Slave (A. James Speyer, “Twentieth-Century European Painting and Sculpture,” Apollo, n.s., 84, no. 55 [Sept. 1966], p. 223, fig. 1.)
1997: Le Serf—L’Esclave/The Serf—The Slave (Claude Duthuit and Wanda de Guébriant, Henri Matisse: Catalogue raisonné de l’oeuvre sculpté [Claude Duthuit, 1997], p. 10, cat. 6.) - The production date of the work has been variously noted:
1951: 1900–03 and 1900–02 (Barr, Matisse, pp. 305, 557.)
Nov. 1951: 1900–03 (Museum of Modern Art, Henri Matisse, p. 11, cat. 76; p. 14.)
1952: 1900–03 (Ritchie, Sculpture of the Twentieth Century, p. 58.)
Oct. 1952: 1900–03 (Museum of Modern Art, Sculpture of the Twentieth Century, p. 45, cat. 75.) Feb. 1, 1953: 1900–03 (Ritchie, “Sculpture of the Twentieth Century,” p. 8.)
Mar. 1966: 1900–03 (Art Institute of Chicago, “Matisse Retrospective Exhibition,” Calendar of the Art Institute of Chicago 60, no. 2 [Mar. 1966], n.pag.)
Sept. 1966: 1900–03 (Speyer, “Twentieth-Century European Painting and Sculpture,” p. 223, fig. 1.)
May 1975: 1900–03 (Musée National d’Art Moderne, Henri Matisse: Dessins et sculpture, exh. cat. [Centre Georges Pompidou, 1975], p. 188, cat. 166.)
Sept. 1975: 1900–03 (Dominique Bozo, Henri Matisse: Dessins et sculpture/tekeningen en sculpturen, exh. cat. [Société des Expositions du Palais des Beaux-Arts de Bruxelles, 1975], n.pag., cat. 158.)
1997: 1900–03 (Duthuit and de Guébriant, Henri Matisse, p. 10, cat. 6, no. 1.)
2010: 1900–04 (Stephanie D’Alessandro, “Interruptions and Returns,” in D’Alessandro and John Elderfield, Matisse: Radical Invention, 1913–1917, exh. cat. (Art Institute of Chicago/Museum of Modern Art, New York/Yale University Press, 2010, p. 225.)
2010: 1900–04 (Stephanie D’Alessandro, “Study of ‘Portrait of Sarah Stein,’ ‘Portrait of Sarah Stein,’” in D’Alessandro and Elderfield, Matisse, p. 321.)
2011: 1900–03 (Claudine Grammont, “Matisse as Religion: The ‘Mike Steins’ and Matisse, 1908–1918,” trans. Alison Anderson; Carrie Pilto, “The Steins Build: Le Corbusier’s Villa Stein–de Monzie, Les Terrasses”; “Leo Stein: Plates”; “The Stein Residences in Photographs”; and Robert McD. Parker, “Catalogue of the Stein Collections,” all in The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde, exh. cat., ed. Janet Bishop, Cécile Debray, and Rebecca Rabinow [San Francisco Museum of Modern Art/Yale University Press, 2011], p. 152; p. 173; p. 384, no. 25; p. 386, no. 17; p. 389, no. 3; p. 424.)
2013: 1900–04 (Stephanie D’Alessandro, The Age of Picasso and Matisse: Modern Masters from the Art Institute of Chicago, exh. cat. [Art Institute of Chicago/Kimbell Art Museum, 2013], p. 20 [ill.].)
2014: 1900–04 (Stephanie D’Alessandro, The Age of Picasso and Matisse: Modern Art at the Art Institute of Chicago [Art Institute of Chicago/Yale University Press, 2014], pp. 14 [ill.], 19 [ill.].) - The casting date was published as 1906 in Kimball, “Matisse,” p. 39.
- Oliver Shell, “The Serf,” in Dorothy Kosinski, Jay McKean Fisher, and Stephen Nash, Matisse: Painter as Sculptor, exh. cat. (Baltimore Museum of Art/Dallas Museum of Art/Nasher Sculpture Center/Yale University Press, 2007), p. 106. This work has been dated 1900–03 in Duthuit and de Guébriant, Henri Matisse, 1997, p. 10, but some have argued that the artist continued working on the figure in 1904. See Michael P. Mezzatesta, Henri Matisse Sculptor/Painter (Fort Worth: Kimball Art Museum 1984), pp. 38-43; Flam, Matisse: The Man and His Art, 1869–1918 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986), pp. 85-88; and Stephanie D’Alessandro, “Interruptions and Returns,” in D’Alessandro and Elderfield, Matisse, p. 225, and idem, The Age of Picasso and Matisse, p. 20.
- In the winter of 1900, Henri Matisse called on Rodin at his studio at rue de l’Université in Paris to show the sculptor his drawings. In 1937, Matisse wrote of the encounter: “I once had the good fortune to receive Rodin’s advice on the subject of my drawings. … Yet the advice he gave in no wise [sic] suited me, and on this occasion Rodin merely showed his petty side.” Matisse, “Divagations,” Verve 1, no. 1 (Dec. 1937), as translated in Jack Flam, Matisse on Art, rev. ed. (University of California Press, 1995), p. 126. As Maurice Denise reported, Rodin told Matisse: “Fuss over it, fuss over it. When you have fussed over it two weeks more, come back and show it to me again.” André Gide, The Journals of André Gide, vol. 1, 1889–1913, trans. Justin O’Brien (Knopf, 1947), p. 174. In 1956, Matisse told Raymond Escholier, “I was taken to Rodin’s studio in the rue de l’Université, by one of his pupils who wanted to show my drawings to his master. Rodin, who received me kindly, was only moderately interested. He told me I had facility of hand, which wasn’t true. He advised me to do ‘fussy’ drawings and to show them to him. I never went back.” Escholier, Matisse, ce vivant (Fayard, 1956), pp. 161–62, as translated in Flam, Matisse on Art, p. 284n6.
- Oliver Shell, “Seeing Figures: Exhibition and Vision in Matisse’s Sculpture,” in Kosinski, Fisher, and Nash, Matisse, p. 51. Around the same time, Matisse traded one of his canvases for Paul Gauguin’s Head of a Boy (1886–88); see Barr, Matisse, p. 39. See also Rebecca A. Rabinow, “Vollard and Matisse,” in Rabinow, Douglas W. Druick, and Maryline Assante di Panzillo, Cézanne to Picasso: Ambroise Vollard, Patron of the Avant-garde, exh. cat. (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2006), pp. 131–33.
- Recalling his early interest in Cézanne’s constructive brushstrokes, Matisse recounted to Alfred H. Barr an 1899 conversation with the post-Impressionist painter Camille Pissarro in which Matisse said, “A Cézanne is a moment of the artist while a[n] [Alfred] Sisley is a moment of nature.” Barr, Matisse, p. 38.
- While Bevilacqua has often been assumed to be another name for Cesidio Pignatelli, recent scholarship has distinguished the two Italian models, who were both from Gallinaro in the Val di Comino. See Hilary Spurling, “Matisse’s Italian Models,” in Matisse and the Model, exh. cat., ed. Ann Dumas (Eykyn Maclean, 2011), p. 62. Cesidio Pignatelli (1846–1929) and Giovanni Bevilacqua (1871–1968) were distinguished from each other in Hélène Pinet, Matisse-Rodin, exh. cat. (Musée Rodin, 2009), pp. 85–87; and identified in Michele Santulli, Modelle e Modelli Ciociari nell’arte europea a Roma, Parigi, Londra nel 1800–1900 (Ciociaria Sconosciuta, 2011), pp. 104–06, 168–70.
- As quoted in Hilary Spurling, The Unknown Matisse: A Life of Henri Matisse; The Early Years, 1869–1908 (Knopf, 1998), pp. 214–15.
- Speaking about The Serf, John Elderfield has argued that “it transposes in fact certain aspects of Matisse’s Cézannism—and with them the self-referential qualities developing in his painting—to a sculptural motif that is indebted to Rodin in stance and gesture; and it revises Rodin’s heroic monumentality to create something far more aesthetically contained.” See Elderfield, Matisse in the Collection of the Museum of Modern Art, Including Remainder-Interest and Promised Gifts (Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1978), p. 32.
- See Elderfield, Matisse in the Collection, pp. 28–30.
- Henri Matisse, “Notes d’un peintre,” La grande revue 2, no. 24 (Dec. 25, 1908), as translated in Flam, Matisse on Art, p. 41.
- Artists including Jean Cocteau had previously also rented rooms at the Hôtel Biron, but by 1911 Rodin occupied the entire residence. It later became the Musée Rodin. Accounts by Hans Purrmann (see fig. 3.8, third from the right), who helped manage the Matisse academy in 1908, and Matisse’s daughter, Marguerite, recall that the arms of The Serf fell off when Matisse moved to his new studio at the Hôtel Biron. See Shell, “Serf,” p. 108n1. However, scholars including Albert Edward Elsen and Jack Flam have argued that Matisse may have cut the arms as an aesthetic decision. Elsen speculates that the artist made the choice “perhaps to liberate the silhouette of the thighs, as Rodin had often done in his partial figures.” See Elsen, The Sculpture of Henri Matisse (Abrams, 1972), p. 30; and Flam, Matisse: The Man and His Art, 1869–1918 (Cornell University Press, 1986), p. 487n18. See also Flam’s essay “The Sculpture of Henri Matisse” in C&M Arts, Henri Matisse: Sculpture (C&M Arts, 1998), n.pag.
- Duthuit and de Guébriant, Henri Matisse, p. 10. For more information on Matisse’s casting process, see Ann Boulton, “The Making of Matisse’s Bronzes,” in Kosinski, Fisher, and Nash, Matisse, pp. 73–95.
- Clay must be kept damp to avoid cracking as it dries; Plasticine is formulated to be nondrying.
- When used to cast a plaster version of a sculpture, a mold is often destroyed when it is removed from the plaster; for this reason it is called a waste mold.
- This was reported by the artist’s daughter, Mme Duthuit, as well as the artist Hans Purrmann, who helped manage Matisse’s academy in 1908. See Shell, “The Serf,” p. 108n1.
- Modern sculpture alloys are usually actually alloys of copper, tin and zinc, with lead added to improve pouring.
- Analysis by Marcus L. Young, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois; see Young, ICP-OES report, photocopies on file in the Department of Conservation and Science, Art Institute of Chicago. For more on this technique, see Marcus L. Young, Suzanne Schnepp, Francesca Casadio, Andrew Lins, Melissa Meighan, Joseph B. Lambert, and David C. Dunand, “Matisse to Picasso: A Compositional Study of Modern Bronze Sculptures,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 395, no. 1 (Sept. 2009), pp. 171–84, DOI:10.1007/s00216-009-2938-y.
- Bingen & Costenoble (and later F. Costenoble), active from 1903 to 1920, and, subsequently, F. Godard, were sand-cast foundries with whom Matisse worked. See Boulton, “The Making of Matisse’s Bronzes,” p. 79. Boulton dates Matisse’s switch to lost-wax casting to about 1925.
- Treatment report, 1983, on file in the Department of Conservation and Science, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Treatment report, 1990, on file in the Department of Conservation and Science, Art Institute of Chicago.
- According to a letter by Jeffrey Smith, written on behalf of Sarah Stein, the Steins asked Matisse to cast “The Slave” in bronze for them (without forearms) in 1906. Letter published in Fiske Kimball, “Matisse: Recognition, Patronage, Collecting,” Philadelphia Museum Bulletin 43, no. 217 (Mar. 1948), p. 39. On the end date and later Palo Alto location, see letter from Fiske Kimball to R. Sturgis Ingersoll, Feb. 25, 1947, Philadelphia Museum of Art Archives; photocopy in curatorial object file, Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Samuel Marx to Earl Stendahl, Feb. 1, 1949, Archives of American Art, Earl Stendahl Gallery, roll 2720, frame 1105; photocopy in curatorial object file, Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Art Institute of Chicago; Committee on Painting and Sculpture meeting minutes, Apr. 26, 1949, p. 2; photocopy also in curatorial object file.
- Board of Trustees meeting minutes, May 2, 1949, p. 1; photocopy in curatorial object file, Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Cast 1/10 or 2/10 was included in the 1908 Salon d’Automne.
- In the catalogue for this exhibition, dates not recorded on the work appear in parentheses.
- Although the signatures [“Hm/10” (Paris) and “H m 1/10” (Brussels)] and foundry (Valsuani) recorded in the exhibition catalogues do not match the museum’s cast, receipt of object 26703 confirms that the Art Institute’s sculpture was included in both venues of the exhibition; photocopy in curatorial object file, Department of Modern and Contemporary Art, Art Institute of Chicago.
- Cast 1/10 or 2/10 was included in the 1908 Salon d’Automne.
- In the plate section of this publication, dates not recorded on the work appear in parentheses.
- In this publication, dates not recorded on the work appear in parentheses.
- In Hilary Spurling, Matisse: The Life (Penguin Books, 2009), Spurling states that The Serf was one of a dozen works by Matisse that Sarah Stein purchased in “the early months of 1907” (p. 156), although she also notes that the artist did not remove the figure’s arms until 1908 (p. 86). According to Spurling, all of Sarah’s early Matisse acquisitions—including The Serf—were “bought or borrowed from Leo and Gertrude [Stein]” (p. 157).
- Not in exhibition. Although the brackets following the mention of the Serf on page 152 direct back to plate 58, which pictures the cast currently in the collection of the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, the text is referring to the cast made for Sarah and Michael Stein. Therefore, the reference on page 152 is to the Art Institute cast, even if the related plate is of a different version. See The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso, and the Parisian Avant-Garde, ed. Janet Bishop, Cecile Debray, and Rebecca Rabinow, exh. cat. (San Francisco Museum of Modern Art/Yale University Press), pp. 104–05.
- Not in exhibition.
- Not in exhibition. The text refers to the Art Institute cast, although the illustrative plate is for a different version. For the plate, see The Steins Collect, pp. 104–05.
- The association of Bingen & Costenoble began in 1903; Elisabeth Lebon, Dictionnaire des fondeurs de bronze d’art: France, 1890–1950 (Marjon, 2003), p. 112.
Entry by Marin Sarvé-Tarr, technical report by Suzanne R. Schnepp, "Cat. 3 The Serf, 1900–03," in Matisse Paintings, Works on Paper, Sculpture, and Textiles at the Art Institute of Chicago, rev ed. (2019; repr., Art Institute of Chicago, 2025), https://doi.org/10.53269/9780865593022/12