F Logo search & site map      link resources
Features Regulars School News Reviews Calendar Comics

online
gallery

ink
a literary
supplement

preview
the next f

archives

contact


check
artic.edu
webmail

saic home


participate

advertising

about fnews

awards

Art or Idiocy?

Chicago: City on the Verge of What?

When I was a kid in Minnesota and then here in the suburbs, my dad and I would go on walks and he would point out signs of spring: little buds at the ends of branches, flowers beginning to sprout, and the return of birds gone south for the winter. It's spring now and so I am reminded. The art scene here in Chicago is a lot like that. We are always looking for signs of spring, hoping that Chicago is ready to blossom into an important art center.

Thanks to its infamous gangsters, Chicago has the distinction of changing Europe's picture of America from a bunch of cowboys and indians to a game of cops 'n' robbers. But today it seems that Chicago is no longer all that prominent. In the art and culture scene, its heyday was, perhaps, when the innovative talents of the Bauhaus, lead by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, selected Chicago as the site for the new Bauhaus, the Illinois Institute of Technology, and the headquarters for an architectural revolution.

Indeed, a lot of famous artists have come through here. Our school has been host to the likes of Leon Golub, Elizabeth Murray, Claes Oldenberg and Jeff Koons as students, to name a few. Even Robert Storr, senior curator at the MoMA and author of many books and essays, was a grad student here. Sadly, Chicago has never really been a place for artists to stay-at least as far as the art world is concerned. It is more often a place where artists are from or have spent time.

Everyone's favorite scathing quip to make about Chicago: It came in third place, behind New York and L.A., in a contest where only first and second place count.

There is a national attitude that Chicago is a wannabe art center, following on the coat-tails of those two cities. But Chicago seems more pragmatic than that. Artists and galleries making a go of it here seem quite aware and accepting of their"lower" status in the art world. Others claim that people in Chicago are always searching for little scraps of significance in an otherwise dull and lifeless scene. That's not really true either. Artists in Chicago are refreshingly supportive and always on the lookout for others making noteworthy achievements. There are a lot of important things beginning to happen here-signs of spring, if you will.

First of all, the number of dealers and galleries is growing, and they are a lot more friendly and approachable here than in New York and L.A., especially for younger artists and students. I'm not saying you can walk into Zolla/Lieberman with a painting under your arm and walk out with a show. But the galleries will talk to you and give you advice and support.

Probably the most notable thing to happen recently is the growth of the West Loop Gate gallery district, located around Halsted and Peoria streets near Greektown. In recent years, galleries like Vedanta and Peter Miller were joined by Bodybuilder & Sportsman, and today this part of town is well established.

Other upstarts, like Apartment 1R in Pilsen, have recently emerged in the public eye with regular shows and ads in The New Art Examiner. These younger, more cutting edge artists and gallerists are fighting tooth and nail to launch a new gallery district in this area.

Perhaps the most important piece of local news to mention is that the MCA's Manilow senior curator, Francesco Bonami, has been selected to curate the 2003 Venice Biennale. That's a big deal, kids. We're not talking head curator of the U.S. Pavilion, we're talking curator of the whole fucking thing. That's a tremendous shot in the arm, as they say in the business world, for Bonami of course, but also for the MCA and Chicago in general.

Further, an extremely important show in Europe and its recent press coverage not only revisit the Chicago Imagists of the past, but giving rise to new trends in art theory. This groundbreaking show, Eye Infection, featuring the works of R. Crumb, Mike Kelly, Peter Saul, Jim Nutt and Horace Clifford Westerman has long since concluded, but it is only now that its impact is being felt. First, due to the arrival and prominence of its lavish catalog in the U.S., with an essay by the aforementioned Storr and, more recently, from Artforum's cover feature on the show (March 2002). Eye Infection is an amazing collection of (primarily) drawings, making an important case for comparing straight-out comic art like Crumb's with the simple drawings of Kelly and Westerman, as well as broader trends in art and popular culture. Eye Infection is an important benchmark for the return of visual art that promotes content, narrative and aesthetics alongside formal and conceptual concerns -an idea long since banished by the powers that be in New York and L.A.

Plainly, the Chicago art scene has always been about art and the people making it. It is less concerned with fashion, trends and status than substance and artistic and personal achievement. Chicago is a much greater place to be yourself and to make the art you like, compared to those art centers where everything is cut-throat, fast-paced and 15 minutes short. Interestingly enough, today the art that goes against the establishment engages in the pleasure of making, the pleasure of seeing and the enjoyment of content. Given its embodiment of these ideals, Chicago is ready to elevate its status and gain notoriety on an international stage.


Return to top

Features      Regulars      School News      Reviews      Calendar      Comics

Current Issue      Archives      Home